I love a good conspiracy
“Bush Plans Permanent Presidency: We Warned You”
It’s perfect. Replace Bush with Chavez and you would have the truth.
Bush doesn’t plan to step down. Ever.
I know. He can’t do that, he won’t, it’s preposterous. It’s also true. Before you start in on how he could never pull that off, ask yourself how many atrocities he’s already got under his designer belt. Torture camps all over the world. Defying the constitution itself in killing Habeas Corpus (for you dimwits, this means they can haul your sorry ass in without having probable cause, and keep you imprisoned forever). Revealing the identity of a CIA spy. Funneling billions in your tax dollars to Republican-run war contractors.
He gets away with this (and one helluva lot more) because people like you refuse to believe that a president would do this.
Or maybe you just don’t give a rat’s ass anymore. ~area51.org
Of course, what do you expect from a Nazi? (i.e. ‘Bush is a Nazi.’)
Don’t miss this followup article which actually preceded the preceding article from the same website… “How Bush Justifies Creating a Dictatorship”
Brushing Off Nagging Suspicions of a Bush Coup ~Democratic underground
Shoved into the internet 'tubes' on November 25, 2007, by Hegemonic Pundit,
under the following categories: hegemony
| Trackback URL for this post
Comments
4 Responses to “I love a good conspiracy”
How dumb will these people look after he leaves though? Believe it or not, with each of these ridiculous assertions of the left, they destroy themselves more and more as the right just points to the facts. Bush as a Chavez is a complete joke and sometimes I think the liberals all over my hometown of NY and in San Francisco live in their own little worlds. The net’s collective (I detest using that word) intelligence will in my opinion outflank them more and more in the real world.
Comment ~ by Michael Lodispoto on November 26th, 2007 2:27 pm - link# -
Wow, calling a guy a Nazi basically makes your argument moot. Yay! Godwin’s Law!
Dude, you’re fat and have a goatee. Go back to ‘MeriKKKa from whence you came. ‘Nuff said.
Comment ~ by Jayz on November 27th, 2007 6:44 pm - link# -
I don’t know Michael. It never seems to hurt their credibility in the media. And even slander that doesn’t stick does seem to have residue that does. Dan Rather’s ‘fake but accurate’ news is a prime example.
Comment ~ by Hegemonic Pundit on November 28th, 2007 3:54 pm - link# -
Perhaps they are taking it a bit far– It is very unlikely indeed that there will not be a peaceful change of power. However, unlike most of what I’ve seen so far, they have used statistics, which in my eyes is a point for them. You seem to be attacking the superficial argument they make without ever focusing on the actual substance, which is that Bush has, up to this point in his presidency, acted with much more executive power than the Constitution, even after you include the clause about wartime powers, would allow. This seems remarkably like a straw man fallacy.
That said, I don’t agree that Bush is a nazi or that he will try to stay in office.
Comment ~ by V. M. Molotov on December 11th, 2007 7:11 pm - link# -
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
