Communist reform
The progressives want to bring us change. But what kind of change? How about a “maximum wage”? Surely no one needs to make more than $500,000 a year right? Right?
This is the kind of change that Obama supporters want. Plain and simple, it’s commie pipe-dreams.
As ignorant as it sounds there seem to be too many people for whom this illiterate socialistic claptrap seems plausible.
I’m not rich nor do I ever expect to make $500,000 a year but that doesn’t mean that no one else should ever make more than that. In fact, one could make the case that a country which limits the income of it’s citizens in this manner will in fact be limiting the freedom and prosperity of the entire country.
Go ahead, call me a communist, but this would be a world of equality where 90% could consider themselves in the middle class, a sustainable society where no ones really loses, even those who are sacrificing their excess to charity. Think about it: An owner of a fine dining establishment can rest assured that with everyone else out there earning a reasonable salary, his restaurant will always be full. Even though he will make no more than a half million per year, he is guaranteed a steady business. Small businesses would flourish! Most folks would be much better off. Imposing this new payment structure will allow people to find out that the meaning of success has nothing to do with unfettered wealth, but it has to do more with satisfaction of one’s self, just going to bed knowing you’ve done your best.
Limiting the income of businesses means limiting business to a kind of serfdom. No expansion. No investment. No economies of scale. No research and development. In short this kind of communist ‘reform’ would result in making citizens subservient to the only organization allowed to make more than $500,000 a year… the government.
Shoved into the internet 'tubes' on May 7, 2008, by Hegemonic Pundit,
under the following categories: hegemony
| Trackback URL for this post
