Liberals will retreat
This is why all debate with the left about Iraq and the war on terror is useless. They say that it’s only Iraq that we must retreat from, and yet they began by protesting the war in Afghanistan and once they achieve strategic defeat in Iraq they will immediately begin fomenting retreat from Afghanistan as well.
Katrina Vander Heuval:
Last month, the bipartisan Rand Corporation concluded in an important report that the very notion of a “war on terror” is counterproductive, and that intelligence and police cooperation should be the centerpiece of our strategy. More recently, New York Times columnist Tom Friedman — no milquetoast when it comes to using military force — criticized the Dems’ position on Afghanistan as ill-conceived “bumper sticker politics.” Friedman quoted a valuable Time article by Afghan expert Rory Stewart. Reporting from Kabul, Stewart explains: “A troop increase is likely to inflame Afghan nationalism because Afghans are more anti-foreign than we acknowledge, and the support for our presence in the insurgency areas is declining … The more responsibility we take in Afghanistan, the more we undermine the credibility and responsibility of the Afghan government and encourage it to act irresponsibly.”
Stewart, a longtime observer of Afghan politics, makes clear that the temptation to throw more military forces at the problem may do more harm — to our security, to the Afghan people who are already angry about mounting civilian casualties, and to the stability of a region whose underlying conflicts require political resolution not more US or NATO troops. ~alternet.org
Shoved into the internet 'tubes' on August 29, 2008, by Hegemonic Pundit,
under the following categories: 21st century socialism, afghanistan, democrats, idiotarians, iraq, leftists, liberal agenda, liberals, terror war, the left, war for oil, war on terror
| Trackback URL for this post
